This is really about Python threadsafeness I guess (but the numbers sounds cool). I have had various issues with python through out the development of the module (mainly related to pythons rather strange threading model). After discovering some issues the night before the conferance pressentation I set it upon myself to write some unit-tests for the python script module to make sure the threads are actually safe and works correctly. And in doing so I got some interesting numbers.

 OK: Summary Collected 109989 checks in 10 seconds: 10930/s

At the OSMC conference the other day they presented some numbers comparing Shinken with Nagios and Icinga and the gist of it was that Shinken was around 4 times as fast as Nagios with Shinken running 120k checks in 5 minutes which roughly translates to 400 checks/second. Now in my python unit test what I do is I run an internal python based check (forwarding the result via internal channels again to Python) but in doing so to be able to force simultaneousness I run 50 threads pumping around 15k checks per second. This means I get (after running around 100000 checks) an average measured from python 10930 checks per second. This at an average 30% CPU load on my machine... And yes, this is not fair at all, first off I have no idea what kind of hardware they used to run their checks and neither do I do any proper service checks (in fact running 10k+ service checks per second could actually even exhaust my local port stash since each remote check would probably take a few seconds). Regardless I think it shows that NSClient++ is able to schedule a lot of checks and more importantly for me Python is now thread safe (I hope :) )... // Michael Medin