NSClient++ Help (#1) - check_msmq over check_nrpe (#1019) - Message List
Hello all,
I have a problem with check_nrpe + check_msmq over Icinga on Centos 6.2.
I am using the NSClient++ 0.3.9 on a windows Server 2008 R2 Standard 64bit.
I want to check some mail queue´s over nrpe with msmq on the windows server.
The problem is when I try to run the following command :
check_nrpe -H 10.0.0.1 -c check_msmq -a ListQueueNames
directly from the Icinga server I get the following response:
DIRECT=OS:server01.domain.de\private$\queue1 DIRECT=OS:server01.domain.de\private$\queue2 DIRECT=OS:server01.domain.de\private$\queue3 DIRECT=OS:server01.domain.de\private$\queue4
When I try to run the following command:
check_nrpe -H 10.0.0.1 -c check_msmq -a MessageCount DIRECT=OS:server01.domain.de\\private$\\queue1 100 200
I get the following response:
MessageCount OK - DIRECT=OS:server01.domain.de\\private$\\queue1: 0|MessageCount=0;100;200
For me this looks ok, so that the commands and responses are doing well. I have edited the following 2 config files at the Icinga server: Commands.cfg & windows.cfg
Commands.cfg:
# 'check_msmq' command definition
define command {
command_name check_msmq
command_line $USER1$/check_nrpe -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -p 5666 -t 30 -c check_msmq -a $ARG1$ $ARG2$ $ARG3$ $ARG4$
}
Windows.cfg:
define service{
use generic-service
host_name server01.domain.de
service_description MessageCount
check_command check_msmq!MessageCount DIRECT=OS:server01.domain.de\\private$$\\queue1 1000 4000
}
When I try to run the command with Icinga I get the following response in the webfrontend.
Status: Critical Status Information: Critical – Queue ‘DIRECT=OS:server01.domain.deprivate$queue4’ not found DIRECT=OS:server01.domain.deprivate$queue1
I tried a lot of things but nothing really helped, what I am doing wrong? Thanks for your help
-
Message #2688
First off since there is a $ there I would be careful to make sure it is escaped properly (but you are using $$ so I assume you have validated this already). Might be a good idea to write a batch wrapper script without the arguments just to make sure that is not the case.
Also it is a bit puzzling that the last example you post is for BOTH queue1 and queue4 whereas all the others are only for queue1?
mickem07/12/12 22:03:38 (10 months ago)








